Bob Ryan

Qualifications:

 

1.  Strengths.

What makes you the best candidate to be Mayor of Bellingham?

 

I believe my experience as an elected representative for the people of Bellingham over the past 12 years in addition to the relationships I have developed with the staff and department heads makes me the best candidate.

                       

2.  Weaknesses.

Many in our neighborhoods feel that the choice of Mayor this year will be between vision/leadership and administrative experience.  What do you perceive as your weakest attribute of the two and how will you address this?

 

Vision/Leadership includes the ability to describe where you want to go in a clear manner that people understand and agree with and will want to follow.  Administrative experience is a skill necessary to properly run any group of people.  I think a good mayor should have all of these qualities and I believe that I do.

 

Growth and Planning:

 

3.  Consistent Development Process and Neighborhood Input.

The spot rezone process that was recently used for the Squalicum Lofts proposal created an unfair situation pitting neighbors against the developer, Planning staff, and policy makers in an unpredictable process.  Without changes, other neighborhoods and developers will be similarly affected in the future.  What are your observations of this process and what would you propose as Mayor working with Planning staff to protect the integrity of Comprehensive Plan goals and policies, neighborhood plan updates, and a meaningful proactive exchange of ideas with stakeholders?

 

There are improvements that must be made to the development process.  If criteria are developed and agreed to by the staff and the Council they must be used.  You can’t have predictability if the Council makes up their own rules as they go.  When the City removed the land use regulations from the neighborhood plans it drastically reduced the predictability in the comprehensive plan.  Homes are the largest investments most people ever make.  Predictability is essential for anyone to have faith in land use planning.  The problem with communication with the city of Bellingham is that they seem to think that if they tell you what to do that is communicating – it isn’t, that is a lecture.  The City needs to learn to listen.  Communication is an exchange, a two way dialogue; many city employees don’t seem to understand that.

 

4.  Urban Center Infill.

Do you support the Comprehensive Plan’s direction of infill housing created through Urban Centers and if so, how can this method be expedited in order to take pressure off leap-frogging in inappropriate areas?

 

Urban Center infill is a wonderful concept, it is also very difficult to achieve. Areas for urban centers can be identified but before they are developed the land must be aggregated into one ownership which is difficult and time consuming.  Infill is a different process.  It is using undeveloped or underutilized land for housing.

 

Lake Whatcom Watershed:

 

5.  Watershed Comprehensive Plan.

How will you move the community to embrace an overriding vision with specific goals for stormwater management and land acquisition in the Lake Whatcom watershed that will effectively and immediately maintain and then, eventually, further reduce pollution levels?

 

Bellingham has worked toward the protection of Lake Whatcom for many years.  Tens of millions of dollars have been spent in property acquisition in the watershed.  The largest problem currently is storm water runoff into the lake.  Until we have a system to control runoff we won’t be able to solve this problem.

 

6.  Funding Choices.

In last week’s Cascadia Weekly Gristle Column, Tim Johnson declares Bellingham has two waterfronts demanding our community resources.  As Mayor, how will you prioritize and provide direction for Lake Whatcom drinking water protection versus cleanup and redevelopment of the salt waterfront?

 

Budgeting is always a matter of prioritization.  We absolutely must have clean safe drinking water.  Redevelopment of the former Georgia Pacific site is a rare opportunity to reconnect Bellingham to its waterfront.  We certainly would like to do both.  Which is the higher priority?  Certainly the drinking water supply.

 

Waterfront Redevelopment:

 

7.  Harbor Cleanup.

Describe, briefly, the key features of the cleanup plan favored by the Port of Bellingham for “New Whatcom,” the adjacent waterways, and the ASB and are you satisfied with this plan/agreement?  Have you read the Interlocal Agreement (and the three Supplemental Agreements) between the City and the Port and is it a “fair’ agreement for both parties?

 

The “Waterfront” redevelopment plan proposed by the Port of Bellingham is basically to take a polluted industrial site and develop it into an area that can be used for housing, offices and commercial uses.  In order to do that various levels of cleanup are required.  The city of Bellingham and the Port have entered into interlocal agreements to describe the responsibilities of both parties.  I have read and helped develop these agreements.  It is essential that everyone involved understands their role.  If the relationship between the City and the Port is not “fair” it will not go forward.

 

8.  Infrastructure:

What is your “back of the envelope” list of Capital needs and your guess as to the cost?  By how much would your list exceed the borrowing capacity of the COB?  At what point would the amount borrowed lead to higher interest rates?  What would be your priorities?

 

The city of Bellingham has a non voted debt capacity of $103,029,728 of that non voted capacity the City has used $32,802,613 leaving a balance of  $70,227,115 available.  Bellingham also has a voted and non voted debt capacity of $171,716,213 of that the City has used $34,342,613 leaving a balance of $137,373,600.  If Bellingham substantially increases its debt we will also lose our Aa1 credit rating.  A lowered credit rating will increase the cost of borrowing to the city.

 

9.  Redevelopment of the Waterfront:

Will the economic benefit exceed the cost for the average Bellingham taxpayer and under what conditions?  What will the impact of this redevelopment be on the adjacent neighborhoods and how would you go about minimizing them? 

 

Redeveloping the waterfront will not occur overnight.  The City has spent money to spur development in our downtown; this “priming the pump” was successful.  We will need to invest money on the waterfront.  As our redevelopment plan is developed we have to ensure that investment pays dividends commensurate to the cost.

 

Recreation:

 

10.  Parks, Trails, and Open Space.

Besides the dedicated funding of the Greenways III levy, how would you suggest the City balance its parks, trails, and open space system so that north Bellingham is better represented?  Is this a priority issue for you?

 

As the Meridian/Cordata area is infilled the City must ensure that a system of parks and trails are part of that development.  A system of parks and trails are essential to all Bellingham neighborhoods.

 

Emergency Response:

 

11.  Utility lines.

Our neighborhoods have large industrial high-pressure gas pipelines and high voltage power lines running through residential areas.  There are houses connected directly to the gas lines, still at high pressure.  These were installed to service industries in the area.  They pose tremendous danger in case of earthquake.  The Cascade Natural Gas franchise agreement will be renegotiated for a new term during your tenure as Mayor.  PSE's agreement can be reopened after January 31, 2013.  What should new agreements with any utility company provide for to protect our neighborhoods?  How important is this issue to you?  Are you prepared to ask these companies to reopen the contracts now to provide safe service?

 

We learned how important pipelines are when we lost three young lives in the Olympic Pipe Line explosion.  I believe it is essential to correct any unsafe condition at the first opportunity.

 

Personnel Management:

 

12.  Finance Director Role.

What is the role you see of an appointed Finance Director in decisions related to the large financial impacts of the Lake Whatcom watershed and the waterfront redevelopment?

 

The role of finance director is responsible for the financial stewardship of the monetary resources of the city.  It is vital that the finance director understand and be able to advise the Mayor and City Council about the impacts of any financial decisions.

 

13.  Advisory Committees.

What skill set and geographic balance do you look for as a Mayor in the makeup of the Planning Commission and other advisory boards?  Does it concern you that all current members of the Commission live south of Whatcom Creek?

 

The primary skills required as a member of the Planning Commission is an understanding of land use and zoning issues.  It is also necessary to have a grasp of the importance of individual neighborhood character and the vision of the direction Bellingham wants for its future.  Finding people with these qualities is extraordinarily difficult.  I would prefer to have commissioners from all areas of the city but “gold is where you find it”.