Bill Gorman

1.  Strengths.

What makes you the best candidate to be Mayor of Bellingham?

 

     Bellingham is at a crossroads, facing challenges we have never before.  The decisions we make today, regarding our environment, growth, economy, and waterfront, will affect us for years to come.  Our city has the potential to become a great 21st century community: a dynamic synthesis of a clean environment, modern technology, vibrant culture, economic vitality and quality of life. We have all chosen to make Bellingham our home for exactly these reasons.  These are my priorities.  I am qualified to face these challenges.  This is why I’m running for Mayor.

The issues in this campaign are easy to identify.  The solutions are much more complex, requiring innovation, experience and skilled leadership.  Our city needs a mayor with the skills and ability to build a diverse coalition that gives a voice to everyone, not just the noisiest or the wealthiest citizens.

My background is in business and management.  My passion is public service.  I have served on nearly a dozen non-profit community boards and commissions for over 20 years, including the Beyond Greenways levy and organizing the NOPE Campaign to prevent a large, unnecessary power line through the heart of Whatcom County.

Many people have told me how tired they are of “politics as usual.”  As a community, we can continue with divisive, antagonistic and seemingly endless processes of decision-making.  Or – we can mobilize our shared intentionality, resources, intelligence, compassion and creativity toward a common goal of a better city. We need to actively visualize and plan what we want our community to become, not just react to problems as they appear. 

2.  Weaknesses.

Many in our neighborhoods feel that the choice of Mayor this year will be between vision/leadership and administrative experience.  What do you perceive as your weakest attribute of the two and how will you address this?

 

I see my visionary and leadership skills as both equal and necessary to the office of mayor.

I have experience in management, budgeting, marketing and community relations, both professionally, and as a volunteer.  No other candidate in this race has all of this experience and skill, and every candidate but myself, is entering this race with a pre-set agenda, political leanings, and special interests that will preclude the interests of our city as a whole.

My personal studies of history, architecture and the design of cities around the world has given me a unique ability to create a vision for a city livable on a human scale.  In 1980, I earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Industrial Design from WWU, and that education taught me that -we need to make what we build fit people, not the other way around.  I’ve spent a lot of time learning about what makes a city a place where people want to live, where small, locally owned businesses can thrive, and neighborhoods can be comfortable knowing they have good communications with their City Staff.  This is not the usual political background.  I am not the usual politician.

With our current growth rate, we will be grappling with many challenges and the choices we make will determine if we end up looking like Lynwood, or like the people-oriented town we want to be.

Growth and Planning:

 

3.  Consistent Development Process and Neighborhood Input.

The spot rezone process that was recently used for the Squalicum Lofts proposal created an unfair situation pitting neighbors against the developer, Planning staff, and policy makers in an unpredictable process.  Without changes, other neighborhoods and developers will be similarly affected in the future.  What are your observations of this process and what would you propose as Mayor working with Planning staff to protect the integrity of Comprehensive Plan goals and policies, neighborhood plan updates, and a meaningful proactive exchange of ideas with stakeholders?

 

We find ourselves in a situation where everyone is angry and suspicious of everyone else.  Neighborhoods, City staff, builders and citizens feel dismissed, disrespected and ignored.   Customer service provided by the city to the community must improve.  This means more than just moving the furniture around- it means that the fundamental attitude of city management has to change.

 

It is the responsibility of city government to cultivate and insure clean, honest and open communication with its citizens and its employees, so that procedures are consistent and the law is applied equally and fairly, no matter whom you know- or who you are.

 

As mayor, I would immediately undertake a systematic management revolution, clearly identifying the mission of the city and of each of the departments, seeking to improve communication by insuring information consistency with all constituencies, while removing obstacles and inefficiencies hindering staff from doing their jobs.  It is my belief that people will do a good job when given good leadership and that city of Bellingham has great employees.  What our city staff has not had is clear, consistent leadership.

 

 

 

4.  Urban Center Infill.

Do you support the Comprehensive Plan’s direction of infill housing created through Urban Centers and if so, how can this method be expedited in order to take pressure off leap-frogging in inappropriate areas?

 

Intelligent, appropriate infill housing is one of the critical ways we can end our participation in the American addiction to sprawl.  But because the process of planning has become so divisive, this important component of our city comprehensive plan is becoming a stumbling block- not a solution.

 

We have spent so much time planning to create a plan for our planning, we haven’t actually completed the majority of our neighborhood plans.  A wise man gave me this advice about leadership, “Make decisions.  If you make a mistake, correct it and keep going.  If you hesitate to make decisions, everybody waits and a terrible thing happens… nothing.”

 

We have been so seemingly paralyzed by fear, fear of failure, fear of growth, fear of change that we have ground our confidence down to the last nerve.  I believe in the intelligence and wisdom of the citizens of Bellingham and if we trust each other enough to come together, we will do the right things to preserve what we love about this place.  To accomplish this I will so my best to seek out every voice and not let the richest or the loudest voices prevail.

 

 

Lake Whatcom Watershed:

 

5.  Watershed Comprehensive Plan.

How will you move the community to embrace an overriding vision with specific goals for stormwater management and land acquisition in the Lake Whatcom watershed that will effectively and immediately maintain and then, eventually, further reduce pollution levels?

 

Like so many of the arguments that we find ourselves involved in Bellingham, people have chosen a side and have never actually worked together for a common goal. The issue of Lake Whatcom as our watershed is too important to not include everyone.  The word “community” should mean “all the people” in our town, not just the people you agree with.  I would establish a Lake Whatcom Watershed Task Force and set the tone for civil dialogue.  I would include a real diversity of opinion representing activists and boat owners, builders and environmentalists, to take a scientifically based look at the health of our water as it exists now, and what specific steps we can take to protect it in perpetuity.  This will require a level of maturity and a building of trust that will challenge everyone asked to participate in this process.  Our drinking water cannot be held hostage by our inability to get along.  Waiting and arguing is not an option.

 

6.  Funding Choices.

In last week’s Cascadia Weekly Gristle Column, Tim Johnson declares Bellingham has two waterfronts demanding our community resources.  As Mayor, how will you prioritize and provide direction for Lake Whatcom drinking water protection versus cleanup and redevelopment of the salt waterfront?

 

It’s not an either/or proposition.  We do not have the luxury of choosing between these two issues.  In both cases, the city of Bellingham does not need to carry the load alone.  In the Lake Whatcom Watershed, Whatcom County Government and the new emerging city of Sudden Valley need to be our partners.  We have to find ways to work together.  We share the water and the responsibility. 

 

The Port of Bellingham bears the responsibility for the clean up of our waterfront.   Even so, the City of Bellingham must be interested and engaged.  The cost, effectiveness and safety of the eventual clean up will have direct bearing on the cost of new infrastructure and the eventual tax base generated by the waterfront.  

 

Waterfront Redevelopment:

 

7.  Harbor Cleanup.

Describe, briefly, the key features of the cleanup plan favored by the Port of Bellingham for “New Whatcom,” the adjacent waterways, and the ASB and are you satisfied with this plan/agreement?  Have you read the Interlocal Agreement (and the three Supplemental Agreements) between the City and the Port and is it a “fair’ agreement for both parties?

 

The Department of Natural Resources review of the Bellingham Bay and the former Georgia Pacific site has been lengthy, rigorous and thorough.  The clean up plan that has been in the news and outlined by the DNR recommendation for the main channel waterway up to the Squalicum Creek estuary and the ASB (Aerated Stabilization Basin), I believe is safe, prudent and cost effective. 

 

Capping in place the mercury contamination in the waterway and log pond provides a significant and virtually permanent protection from this contamination.  Capping in the log pond needs to be re-engineered to prevent some of the leaking at the edges to provide complete and effective protection from recontamination and this is addressed in the recommendation.  The recommended 6 ft is an additional 3 ft more than has been shown effective in other similar waterway sites where this type of mitigation has worked.  While dangerous, the mercury levels are relatively low and the stable physical state is such that once capped a very safe condition will exist.  Provision and money are in place to regularly monitor the safety over time.

 

The material in the bottom of the ASB is another matter, this is highly contaminated sludge and its removal to an upland fill site is important and prudent.  The Port’s plan to then to reclaim the ASB as a state-of-the-art environmental model boat harbor makes excellent sense.  This plan creates habitat where none has ever existed, it continues the habitat restoration undertaken by the city in the Squalicum Creek estuary and creates a new revenue stream to help pay for this and other cleanup that will be done on the site.

 

I have read the Interlocal Agreements and reviewed the supplemental agreements.  I believe in the initial agreements the economic burden is heavy for the City of Bellingham while the Port enjoys much of the benefit.  This has started to change a little, but more needs to be done to make sure that the City and Port share the burdens and benefits from the reclamation and development of this site. 

 

I agree with the Bellingham Herald’s assessment that as much as is possible, the redevelopment of the waterfront should be self-financing.  I believe this is possible if we are smart, if we do not underestimate the value of what we have, and if we continue to seek a win/win partnership with the Port.  Ultimately, if either the Port or the City is forced into an untenable financial position, neither will win and everyone will suffer.  It is in our mutual best interest that the City and the Port work to assure success for everybody.

 

 

8.  Infrastructure:

What is your “back of the envelope” list of Capital needs and your guess as to the cost?  By how much would your list exceed the borrowing capacity of the COB?  At what point would the amount borrowed lead to higher interest rates?  What would be your priorities?

 

The challenge of meeting the infrastructure needs of this city is much larger than the back of any envelope I know about.  I would not extend Bellingham’s credit beyond that which is fiscally prudent.

 

I will take a more enlightened approach than we have in the recent past.  As the Mayor’s Budget Advisory Board pointed out, the city has tended to underestimate revenue.  This can create a host of misinformed assumptions about how much money the city has, what we should spend and what things we can do.  Before we can make any decisions we must be confident about what we have.

 

That said, our downtown’s aging infrastructure needs attention.  We have utility lines hanging around that no longer have any function and should be removed.  Some of the sewer and water lines in the downtown haven’t been touched since they were originally installed.  This is not interesting stuff for many people, but in is critical to our successful development. I’ve been working with downtown for many years and have listened to people talk about the problems there.  The new development of the Bellingham’s waterfront and the adjacent connections to the downtown present an opportunity that once passed, will never come again.  

 

 

9.  Redevelopment of the Waterfront:

Will the economic benefit exceed the cost for the average Bellingham taxpayer and under what conditions?  What will the impact of this redevelopment be on the adjacent neighborhoods and how would you go about minimizing them? 

 

I believe the value of our waterfront is greater than we dare to dream.  Its redevelopment will create new wealth for this community, and not just for the waterfront.  Downtown, Old Town, the Cultural District, and in fact, every adjacent neighborhood will become more valuable because of the new building, businesses, jobs and homes that will be created.

 

This does not mean that open space must be sacrificed.  In fact, the better job we do insuring the livability, usability and beauty of what we build, the more valuable it will be.  We have been blessed with a blank slate from which to create anything we dare to imagine.  I believe we must be bold.  We are smart, committed people, if we commit, we can accomplish something great.

 

How we move people in and out of this new area is critical to the success of the waterfront and downtown, and to the impact felt by the surrounding neighborhoods.  We are fortunate that all three of our transportation systems pass through the middle of town.  The transit hub is located there.  Our trails all end at the edges of the downtown and our street grid passes through it.

 

Mass transit is working.  With some imagination we can hub the trail system in the downtown by transitioning the trails to dedicated corridors not used by cars, perhaps by using some of the alleys.  Already the trail from Fairhaven passes in front of Morse Square and ends just across the street from Depot Market Square.

 

Automobile traffic will require more imagination to create a better way to get to and from I-5, into to the Downtown and Waterfront.  We do not, and should not, allow every new street to be built just for cars.  If we imagine easy access, with parking hidden in and around the Downtown we then can create streets that are just for people, bicycles and small transit shuttles.

 

It will take the mix of these separate transportation systems working together to meet the demands and challenges of creating a green and modern life.  Our efforts and focus should be to design a clean and easy way to use city center and waterfront.  Easy for busy working families, easy for us aging baby boomers, easy for people with limited mobility, easy for the new growing population of residents, easy for everybody.

 

 

Recreation:

 

10.  Parks, Trails, and Open Space.

Besides the dedicated funding of the Greenways III levy, how would you suggest the City balance its parks, trails, and open space system so that north Bellingham is better represented?  Is this a priority issue for you?

 

I believe that the northern parts of Bellingham have gotten the short end when it comes to open space and parks.  On the surface the practice of including open space and parks as a concession from large developers sounds like a good idea, but has not produced the results expected.  The outcome has been promises not kept and parks not built.  Nor has this part of Bellingham participated in the benefits from the first two Greenways property tax levees.  This must be rectified.  If we have existing agreements for the development of open space and Parks then these agreements should be enforced and executed.  We should not allow parks and open space become a bargaining chip.  Parks, trails and open space are central to the character and identity of Bellingham and should be such in all parts of the city. 

 

The Greenways program has been hugely successful and has proven to be a popular priority for Bellingham Voters.  My wife, Taimi and I participated vigorously in the Beyond Greenways Campaign, one of the results of which was purchase of the Fairhaven Village Green property for use as a public park.   As I stated in my answer about Waterfront Development, our trail system is developing into a significant third transportation system for the city and as such it should extend everywhere.

 

Leadership is this case means that the City must be certain the whole community shares the benefit and the burden of Parks an open space equally.

 

 

Emergency Response:

 

11.  Utility lines.

Our neighborhoods have large industrial high-pressure gas pipelines and high voltage power lines running through residential areas.  There are houses connected directly to the gas lines, still at high pressure.  These were installed to service industries in the area.  They pose tremendous danger in case of earthquake.  The Cascade Natural Gas franchise agreement will be renegotiated for a new term during your tenure as Mayor.  PSE's agreement can be reopened after January 31, 2013.  What should new agreements with any utility company provide for to protect our neighborhoods?  How important is this issue to you?  Are you prepared to ask these companies to reopen the contracts now to provide safe service?

 

One of the lessons I learned from my participation in the NOPE Campaign in 1990 that successfully stopped a new High Voltage power corridor from slicing through Whatcom county is that the new priorities and realities of our city often conflict with our past.   As quickly as is financially prudent, dangerous conditions should be rectified.  Good leadership seeks to maintain positive working relationships with all of the companies to which the City has granted franchises.  As Mayor I will take the responsibility of advocacy for the city and it’s citizens seriously and in any negotiation fiercely seek to support the cities self interest first. 

 

I have learned in the over 20 years of negotiating contracts with many different businesses in this community, that having an open and honest relationship with companies you work with, and always seeking a win/win outcome is the best negotiating position you can create.  As Mayor I seek to meet with each company and build a strong relationship and open communication.   It is in our mutual interest that homes, families and neighborhoods are safe.

 

PSE has already come to the city with an interesting offer to partner in a program to bury the utilities lines in the downtown and eliminate all of the overhead lines clutter.  This is an offer that bears consideration and is an example that a franchise renewal is not the only time that negotiations will take place.  We must build good relationships and be always ready to negotiate effectively.

 

Personnel Management:

 

12.  Finance Director Role.

What is the role you see of an appointed Finance Director in decisions related to the large financial impacts of the Lake Whatcom watershed and the waterfront redevelopment?

 

Our present Finance Director, Therese Holm has done an excellent job and serves, I believe, as the model for what we should seek from the candidates that will apply for the new appointed position.  Because this person will be the first to fill the appointed position of Finance Director it is critical to the financial accreditation of the City and political credibility of the administration that they perform their duties with the highest ethical and fiduciary standards.  As Mayor, I will have the opportunity to review the finalists for this position and these are the standards I will look for and the performance I will expect. 

 

As a manager of many years, I have hired dozens of employees in my line of work, and assisted non-profits in the hiring of staff and directors.  The next mayor needs to have the experience and qualifications to use objective and rational criteria in hiring and appointments.  They must not be beholden to political parties, special interests or personal friends.

 

 

13.  Advisory Committees.

What skill set and geographic balance do you look for as a Mayor in the makeup of the Planning Commission and other advisory boards?  Does it concern you that all current members of the Commission live south of Whatcom Creek?

 

I learned a long time ago the more diverse the ingredients, the more interesting and productive is the outcome.   On the many non-profit boards on which I have had the opportunity to serve, I have always advocated for diversity in opinion, ideas and background.

 

 In does concern me that none of the planning commissioners come from north of Whatcom Creek.  The make-up many the city advisory boards have tended to leave out some of the voices and opinions in our community.  Our small business community feels particularly overlooked.  This is wrong, and as mayor I would work to make sure these advisory boards represent advice from all parts of our community.